Predicting Binding Pockets with DoGSite3
What is DoGSite3?
DoGSite3 is part of the ProteinsPlus web server collection developed at the University of Hamburg. It works by using a geometry-based method to scan the surface of a protein for cavities. It then analyzes these pockets, calculates their properties (like volume, surface area, and Depth), and visualizes them in an interactive 3D viewer. It's an excellent tool for beginners and experts alike.
A protein (or nucleic acid) structure in PDB format, or the PDB ID for a public structure.
(Optional) Small molecules/ligands in SDF format if you want to use the ligand-bias option.
A modern web browser.
(Optional) PyMOL or UCSF Chimera/ChimeraX to view the downloaded pocket files.
DoGSite3 will consider macromolecular chains with >50 atoms (very small chains are ignored). If your structure has missing loops or side chains, consider modelling them first for a more accurate pocket search.
Step-by-step: using the ProteinsPlus web server
Open ProteinsPlus
Go to https://proteins.plus. (Figure 1)
Figure 1: Proteinplus website
You have two main options:
Enter a PDB ID (e.g., 8fv4) to use a structure from the Protein Data Bank (Figure 2).
Upload a PDB file from your computer (for a model or modified structure).
Figure 2: Enter the PDB ID/structure upload
3. Click on "go" button (Figure 3)
Figure 3: The go button
4. Select the DoGSite3 Binding site detection option (Figure 4).
Figure 4: DoGSite3 Binding site detection option.
5. Chain selection: choose which chains to include (e.g., only the protein chain(s) of interest) (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Chain selection
Figure 6: Job submission
Figure 7: Structure visualization
When the job finishes, you will see a results page with:
Pocket table — each row = a predicted (sub)pocket. The table shows key descriptors: Name, volume (ų), surface area (Ų), depth (Å).
Download — a download button provides data files (pocket coordinates and a text file with calculated pocket properties).
You can visualize the binding pocket using PyMOL, Chimera, or any visualization tools.
Bianchi, V., Gherardini, P. F., Helmer-Citterich, M., & Ausiello, G. (2012). Identification of binding pockets in protein structures using a knowledge-based potential derived from local structural similarities. BMC Bioinformatics, 13(S4). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-s4-s17
Krivák, R., & Hoksza, D. (2018). P2Rank: a machine learning based tool for rapid and accurate prediction of ligand binding sites from protein structure. Journal of Cheminformatics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0285-8.
Liang, J., Woodward, C., & Edelsbrunner, H. (1998). Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: Measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design. Protein Science, 7(9), 1884–1897. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560070905.
Liao, J., Wang, Q., Wu, F., & Huang, Z. (2022). In Silico methods for identification of potential active sites of therapeutic targets. Molecules, 27(20), 7103. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27207103
Huang, B. (2012). Identification of pockets on protein surface to predict protein–ligand binding sites. In Focus on structural biology (pp. 25–39). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5285-6_2
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C. (2013). Allostery in disease and in drug discovery. Cell, 153(2), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.034.
Stank, A., Kokh, D. B., Fuller, J. C., & Wade, R. C. (2016). Protein binding pocket dynamics. Accounts of Chemical Research, 49(5), 809–815. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00516.
Volkamer, A., Griewel, A., Grombacher, T., & Rarey, M. (2010). Analyzing the topology of active sites: on the prediction of pockets and subpockets. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 50(11), 2041–2052. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci100241y.
Volkamer, A., Kuhn, D., Grombacher, T., Rippmann, F., & Rarey, M. (2011). Combining global and local measures for Structure-Based druggability predictions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 52(2), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200454v.